Independent editorial reviews Updated Advertising disclosure ☎ 212-210-1851, talk to our #1 pick
Ranked #2 of 9 Article 9 restructuring Asset-based

Second Wind Consultants review.

Article 9 business restructuring

They don’t negotiate in the ordinary sense, they separate a viable business from its debt through a UCC Article 9 sale.

8.4 / 10 · Strong
Business-debt focus9.2
Legal firepower8.6
Fee structure7.2
Transparency7.8
Speed8.2
Fees
Transaction-based; not published
Debt types
Full balance-sheet restructures
Minimum debt
Typically $250K+ situations
Typical timeline
Months; process-driven
Coverage
National (Massachusetts-based)
Ratings
Long operating history; strong professional referrals

Our verdict

Second Wind does not negotiate in the ordinary sense. Its instrument is the Article 9 reorganization: a sale process under the Uniform Commercial Code through which a viable operating business is separated from the debt that would otherwise consume it. The mechanism is lawful and severe, and for the right business it produces something settlement cannot: a clean balance sheet.

The fit is narrow, and honesty requires saying so. An owner holding two stacked advances and no hard assets has given an Article 9 process nothing to work with. That owner belongs with a settlement specialist. But an asset-backed company too deep for negotiation, with a bank or factor already in the picture, should have Second Wind on the shortlist.

The score reflects two deductions: pricing transparency (published nowhere, structured around the transaction) and the reality that most readers of this page (MCA-stacked, service-sector, asset-light) are outside the firm’s sweet spot.

What we like

  • A structural fix, not a payment plan, predatory debt comes off the balance sheet
  • Protects operations and receivables from UCC 9-406 interference during the process
  • Decades of turnaround pedigree; the referral partner for banks and restructuring attorneys
  • Converts personal guarantees into affordable settlements

What gave us pause

  • Narrow fit: no hard assets means an Article 9 process has nothing to work with
  • Pricing is structured around the transaction and published nowhere
  • The mechanism is severe; funders who lose collateral to it use other words

Who it’s for

  • Asset-backed businesses too deep for settlement
  • Companies with bank, factor, or ABL relationships to protect
  • Owners facing personal guarantees on large positions

Who should look elsewhere

  • Asset-light businesses with stacked MCAs (settle instead)
  • Anyone who needs published, predictable pricing

How Second Wind Consultants stacks up against our #1 pick

Second Wind ConsultantsDelancey Street
Score8.4/10 · Strong9.8/10 · Exceptional
FocusArticle 9 business restructuringMCA & business debt settlement
FeesTransaction-based; not publishedA percentage of the debt · no other fees
TimelineMonths; process-drivenWeeks for single advances; months for stacked files

Local guides where readers use this review